Talk:Spawn Incursions

Do we really need to include the supposed "eighth incursion"

I'm in the discord server itself and I doubt its actions because really they haven't really done anything apart from its "happening next week", and the reasons for starting the incursion are pretty weak(see here). (call me a fitfag but even fit and sato agree that incursions are dead until something new has spawned. should we leave it in or naa?

I agree with this as the 8th incursion page is based around gaining attention which will cause another Queen_Avios incident. The 8th incursion page will be removed

- Jonathan222

2b2t Wiki Bureaucrat

Ants sub count

He has over 3 mil not 2

Jared's 8th incursion

Should we add Jared's 8th incursion and rename the 8th incursion(s) to meme 8th/9th incursions?

We have been discussed this. Fact of the matter is that the incursion itself accomplished almost nothing and that feeble efforts to do so anyway were not made. A note will likely be affixed in the near future, but we'll see --Joey Coconut1 (talk) 15:02, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

But I still think Jared's 8th incursion should be included in the 8th incursion(s) section since the meme incursions accomplished nothing too (except for being a meme/joke). -OP

Seperate the Articles!

This page has gotten way too clunky and large for what is needed. I suggest we give each incursion its own page so that some newfag searching for info doesn't get a headache from this monster of an article. If the purge gets to have its own page, why not each incursion? --_xXx_✡️ ☭ 卍 ElliotRodger523 卐 ☭ ✡️_xXx_ (talk) 09:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

I agree but If we do that , all the links to the different incursions in other articles should be changed it would be a massive chaos :( --Fatitude (talk) 17:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

The sequence of the later Incursions

I started the 10th Incursion. It was named as such with the following thoughts in mind.

The Purge was an incursion with a namechange, nothing else differentiates it from the others. Some participants referred to it as one anyways. The Purge, sequentially is the 8th Incursion.

Following the Purge, was the so-called '8th Incursion', which the staff in the 10th determined was named in error, as it completely ignored The Purge. Because of this, the so-called 8th Incursion was viewed as the 9th sequentially.

Taking this into consideration, this is why the 10th Incursion was so named.

--Joey Coconut1 (talk) 16:36, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Regarding the Eighth Incursion, it ignored the Purge because it saw purges as different entities. Not as an Incursion, this is a debate with no wrong or right answers, because everybody can have their own opinion on wether or not the Purge was an Incursion, however, may I remind that the initial reason for the name "Purge" to even exist was because of the FitMC propaganda against Incurisons, and the fear that they might be dead (which turned out to be false, with the Eighth Incursion later turning into the Infinity Incursion, and later, the beginning of the 10th Incursion which FitMC even mentioned in his video). In a nutshell, the Purges were viewed as seperate entities when the Eighth Incursion took place, and they didn't succeed in killing the incursions.

--Asab (talk) 19:40, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Abbreviating ordinals

I'm moving all Incursion articles to use number form (eg: "1st" → "first"), as they are most commonly written so, especially past the first few Incursions. I brought this up in the Discord months ago without any concerns but forgot to make the moves, so I will now. —  Melofors  TC  02:16, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

I think that name of article shall have minimal count of numbers (or don't have them). For example article WW1 on Wikipedia is World War I. Please use Roman numbers or words (first, second, third etc.). --Tigran Ovanyan (talk) 13:55, 4 May 2022 (UTC)