Separate the Pages

This article does not need to exist. It's bloated, clunky, and could easily be split up into many pages concerning each group. If the groups weren't important enough to get their own pages and aren't even mentioned in the rest of the wiki, then they aren't notable enough. But if they are mentioned in other pages and have information on them, they should get pages. The pages will be small, but still easily readable and coherent. I really want to know the plus side of having this page instead of splitting it up. What are the negatives of that? -ElliotRodger523 (talk) 21:31, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Return to "Small groups" page.