2b2t Wiki:Proposed Changes to 2b2t Wiki Staff

Definition of demotion: Remove bureaucrat & administrator role Definition of promotion: Add bureaucrat & administrator role

Demotion of DarkAnnihilator

I believe he should be demoted. He has been generally inactive for over a year, and he originally promoted a couple bad bureaucrats who've been abusive and biased. --CremationEnthusiast (talk) 23:52, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Dark served us well when he was active, but that is no longer the case.His last edit was last edit 16:51, 8 September 2019. We need an active owner that promotes a strong community and inspires good people to participate in discussion. His absence and resultant negligence have caused abuse, bias, and misinformation to creep into this wiki. --Joey Coconut1 (talk) 00:18, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

He should be demoted. He has been inactive for quite a while now, we need active and competent bureaucrats. --H2hermit (talk) 17:22, 9 April 2020 (PST)

Only seen him once lmao --c0mmie/JewishPlayer

A terrible excuse for a staff member. Left for bit and comes back biased. --OMEGAO000 (talk) 01:04, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

He has been inactive for over seven months, allowing for growing abuses by certain members of the remaining staff kept unchecked by the founder's absence. --Henry (talk)

Demotion of jonathan222

He should certainly be demoted. He has been extensively biased and abusive, just refer to any of the articles regarding projects he has taken part in and you'll find an extensive history that doesn't compare to the numerous other articles, which, by any measure, are more historically significant to the server, and yet he leaves them blank or twists them with his own bias, as in the case of his shilling for Wurst. He does not even play the server, and is very unqualified for his position. In addition to this, he has personally slandered me on numerous occasions, and unprofessional behaviour like this ought not to be the behaviour of someone with responsibilities such as his. --CremationEnthusiast (talk) 23:52, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Jonathan has been a negligent shitposter the entire time I've known him, he is not suitable to be an admin because of his unprofessional attitude towards this wiki, as well as his childish behavior in the discord server. He is also out of touch with the realities of 2b2t, with his strong pro-Wurst client bias, and his complete ignorance of Kami client. Beyond this he lacks basic grammatical skills. --Joey Coconut1 (talk) 00:18, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

He is incompetent and extremely biased. His interest in the wiki is just the power he has over it, and he doesn't care about the truth. --H2hermit (talk) 17:22, 9 April 2020 (PST)

Wurst is best client! Demote him! -c0mmie/JewishPlayer

My time on this wiki with Jonathan222 has been a pretty negative experience due to him locking pages and refusing to consider alternative points of view. Jonathan222 stated in March of 2019 that he had not logged in for the past 6 months, in an edit to his own page here https://2b2t.miraheze.org/w/index.php?title=Jonathan222&diff=29867&oldid=29865 This was recently updated to say 12 months. Despite it having been 18+ months since he last logged in, he still acts like his information is up to date, such as when he recently removed Kami and its forks and offshoots from the cheat clients list, saying he had never heard of it, despite it having gained significant popularity in that time. Instead of listening to the community which essentially all agreed that it should be listed, he locked the page in a semi-broken state (an unrelated popular client had fallen through the cracks of the various rearrangements, edits, and reverts, and had been removed entirely) and it took over a week to fix it, and several more weeks to get the newer clients added Leijurv (talk) 00:36, 10 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Also: The entire recent history of this page: https://2b2t.miraheze.org/w/index.php?title=Ultimate_Guide_to_2b2t.org&action=history Jonathan's solution to any disagreement seems to be to just lock the page instead of actually figuring out what's true and neutral. (Also, full disclosure: this edit https://2b2t.miraheze.org/w/index.php?title=Ultimate_Guide_to_2b2t.org&diff=34763&oldid=34746 was written by me, but carried out by SoiledCold since the page was locked; he could edit and I couldn't) Leijurv (talk) 00:44, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Jon exhibits a constant lack of knowledge regarding certain subjects. Not only that, he is also biased. --OMEGAO000 (talk) 01:04, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

+Demotion Jonathan. We've had enough argument over the Cheat Clients page a few months back, now (not even cherry-picking anything) he is back at it: https://2b2t.miraheze.org/w/index.php?title=Cheat_Clients&type=revision&diff=34779&oldid=34642. Trust is earned hard and lost easily. If someone puts innocent Changelogs to hide his ill-edits, I can no longer trust the person VADemon (talk) 01:16, 10 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Another example now that you mention it, is this edit. The description is "fix guide" while instead the content is just, strange. For example it states that Impact does not have useful ESP while it has many modes, and his favorite example (tracers that change color based on distance) actually had been added to the client two months prior. I told him this in Discord, and he allowed me to undo it without locking the page. It's quite ridiculous to add in a statement saying "Impact does not useful ESP features" while having no idea what features it does or doesn't have. Especially hidden behind an innocent sounding edit summary like "fix guide". https://2b2t.miraheze.org/w/index.php?title=Cheat_Clients&diff=34024&oldid=34020 It also, as many others have mentioned, shills his personal favorite client Wurst, calling it "a wonderful client that contains many great modules" Leijurv (talk) 01:56, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Demotion of Rohen Tahir

He should be demoted for many of the same reasons as jon. He is incompetent and unqualified, as well as combative when he doesn't get his way. --CremationEnthusiast (talk) 23:55, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Rohen is a textbook example of what it means to be unprofessional,even today, he called me a retard, and said to "please end your pathetic existance via differential pressure hazard already". This is not the behavior a Bureaucrat should EVER exhibit, as his task is to motivate the lower members and solve conflicts. He additionally blocked a large rules overhaul from Galvatron, largely concerning Rohen's and Jon's rampant shitposting in the announcements channel of the discord. Again, another Bureaucrat that lacks basic grammatical capabilities. --Joey Coconut1 (talk) 00:18, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Same reason as jonathan. -H2hermit (talk) 17:22, 9 April 2020 (PST)

Follows jon in the way he acts and regards the site. --OMEGAO000 (talk) 01:04, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Re-promotion of LordGalvatronMC

He was demoted unfairly. Simple as that. --CremationEnthusiast (talk) 23:55, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

I have known Galvatron a long time, he has always been a kind, fair man. For his entire time on this wiki, he has worked tirelessly writing and editing articles, with a professional attitude. He does not act out like many others within the leadership, and he also has grammatical capabilities. He acts with professionalism. For an editor like me, he is a strong boon, and I'm appreciative to have him in this community. --Joey Coconut1 (talk) 00:18, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

He was a good bureaucrat. He didn't deserve to be demoted. -H2hermit (talk) 17:22, 9 April 2020 (PST)

Galvatron did nothing wrong Leijurv (talk) 00:42, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

He takes the wiki seriously, and not only that he acts tirelessly on articles. He takes suggestions from others, making it easy to work with him. --OMEGAO000 (talk) 01:04, 10 April 2020 (UTC)